17. Vernon Handley, Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, 1993

Holst - The Planets (Handley)

iTunes
Amazon.com

I’ve been told (well, I read it on a couple of web pages) that Vernon Handley’s version of These here Planets is definitely the one to buy. The word on the street web pages is that it’s better than everyone else’s. I’ll put on my skeptical hat and say “We shall see.”

I’m listening to “Mars” now, and I have to say it’s pretty good. Actually, it’s very good. No, make that excellent. While I’m listening I’m noticing a few things. One is that Vernon Handley has a sure hand in every aspect of this movement. (He knows exactly what he’s doing, and he’s doing it exceptionally well.) Another is a little detail that at first I didn’t like, but now I do. In the middle of “Mars”, when the orchestra goes all woozy (3:09-4:16) and at the end of it they start the pummelling march. In that last second before the march, the orchestra’s volume decreases very quickly (or a “rapid decrescendo” if you want to get fancy). At first I was annoyed, but then I went back and played it again, and then it made sense. It sounds like the orchestra is dying. As for the rest of “Mars”, it’s unbelievably sure-footed. While the march continues relentlessly, my brain is saying “Go! Go! Go!”. When the orchestra went blam! for the last time (6:11-6:19), my jaw dropped. This is magnificent. This is a “Mars” to play as loudly as possible. Trivia: Near the end of “Mars”, when the orchestra starts scurrying about (6:39-6:47), building up to the death throes (starting at 6:47), there’s a horn note in amongst all that hubbub (at 6:42) that I can’t find anywhere in the score. I’m reading along with the music, but I don’t see a solitary horn note. Odd. Maybe it’s an enthusiastic horn player’s way of saying, “Just one more note. I just want to play one more!” Anyway, the death throes are mighty brutal, in keeping with the rest of this bruising “Mars”.

“Venus” is interesting. I like how there’s not a trace of sentimentality or saccharine-ness in it. There are a few moments of slightly dodgy intonation from the violins (1:49, 1:50, 2:24, 2:42, 2:46, 3:04-3:06, 5:48, and elsewhere), but they are slight. This orchestra’s not alone in that regard – a lot of other versions of “Venus” have the same problem. (“You fiend, Holst, writing difficult violin parts!”) The solo cello at 4:37: Oops. The last minute or so (from 7:36 onwards) is played with lovely delicacy. This was a very nice “Venus”. The blend of the instruments as they come in, one after the other, from 5:18-5:39, is beautiful. And I think I put way too many commas in that previous sentence. The more I’m listening to Tod Handley’s The Planets, the more I’m realising it’s a remarkably clear-eyed interpretation. The recording quality helps enormously here, because it’s excellent. You can hear everything.

“Mercury” has bags of character (try the instrumental interplay from 1:53-2:20 – marvellous). While “Mercury” is playing, I’m thinking to myself, “This is one of the best ‘Mercury’s I’ve heard.”

Thanks to the recording quality, this is one of the brightest “Jupiter”s I’ve come across. At 1:00 there’s a tiny horn mistake. (It’s a slightly cracked note, but it happens so quickly you might not notice it at all.) Actually, I reckon the sound quality might be not helping this “Jupiter”, because as it’s progressing I’m finding myself wanting it to sound more mellow. (“Tone down the treble, guys!”) This applies especially to the Big Tune (3:11-4:57). But on the upside, I can hear everything with unrivalled clarity. Oops Moment: There’s a noticeable edit at 5:43. Despite that audible awkwardness, the rest of “Jupiter” is mighty good. I like the final chord (7:53) – it’s a great orchestral exclamation mark.

“Saturn” is excellent – apart from a tiny niggle. Niggling Niggle: I wanted the cellos and double basses playing that walking bass line from 1:44 to be louder, and to be a bit more gruff. But that’s neither here nor there. The orchestral balance when the organ comes in near the end (from 6:57) is absolutely wonderful. I could listen to that all day. (And the extremely high quality of the recording lets me hear the tone of the bells in this section. Yowser.) This is a splendid marvellous magnificent “Saturn”.

Trivia Question: What’s the sound in “Uranus” at the end of the timpani-thwackin’ (0:16)? I’m asking because I don’t know. It sounds like a bassoon going “bluh-blub”, but nothing – not even a bassoon – is mentioned in the score at the end of that timpani-thwackin’. If you have any clues, feel free to let me know. OK. I’ll try to stop wondering what that “bluh-blub” was and pay attention to the rest of “Uranus”. Oh, this is good. The orchestra sounds like it’s having a great time. It’s playing so well. “Uranus” has just finished, and I’d like to revise that “good” to excellent.

Now for “Neptune”. Woah, I’m only 30 seconds into “Neptune” and already I’m thinking this is exactly my kind of “Neptune”. It’s not just full of mystery, it’s full of Mystery Plus (i.e., “Secrets of the Universe” kind of mystery). 2:17-2:23: Those violins. Wow. Spooky. And the low organ note at 3:04: Extra wow. It felt like the floor gave way, or a bottomless pit opened up and I fell into it. Wow. I am absolutely loving this “Neptune”. Along with “Mars”, this might be the best performance on the CD. The women’s choir has come in at 3:42, and I’m so relieved it’s excellent. The ladies are possibly a little too loud for their ethereal fade-out (they certainly take their time getting quieter), but I don’t mind at all – not when I just spent the last three-and-a-half minutes listening to what I just listened to (i.e., the ladies warbling away in an exceedingly pleasant manner).

All up, this is a darn-tootin’ (Translation: very good) recording of Da Planets.

However…

Update: Now that I’ve listened to it a couple more times, that x-ray-clarity recording quality is beginning to bother me. Having a view inside everything may work wonders in recordings of other works, but for These Planets I think it’s a little unhelpful. Vernon The Handy Handley Handiman and his crew do an admirable job (see above paragraphs), but the forensic approach is getting on my nerves a little more with each listen. But it’s still awfully good.

Update 2: I just listened to it again, and this time the previously-thought-of-as-fierce sound quality didn’t bother me at all. I don’t know what’s going on here, but I had no trouble at all with the sound this time. Weird.

And I hope I don’t pester you with more useless updates.

17 thoughts on “17. Vernon Handley, Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, 1993

  1. Tad Ulrich September 1, 2016 / 7:31 am

    Peter, I really love VERNON HANDLEY’S planets. Just finished giving it a twice-over. A coupla things I’d like to nitpick, though. My biggest nit is that the tempo of MARS really slows down after about 3:30. I can’t imagine that was intentional. Easy to correct, though. I increased the tempo of the last half with the first half through Audacity and now everything’s fine. That’s a great program ’cause you can change tempo without altering pitch. Anyway my mod Mars is now 7:11 minutes long. Now I don’t have to say “Hey, guys (and gals) wake up!”

    I also felt that Neptune was a little too short and the ladies were just wee too “goosed” (if you will!) as you alluded to in your review. Soooo, the choir is about 14% less voluminous and the new tempo is 7:28. Bottom line, I’m now really pleased with the overall Handley Planets.

    Just thought I’d share this with you.

    Tad

    Like

    • Peter September 1, 2016 / 8:04 pm

      “Peter, I really love VERNON HANDLEY’S planets. Just finished giving it a twice-over. A coupla things I’d like to nitpick, though. My biggest nit is that the tempo of MARS really slows down after about 3:30. …”

      Yeah, that whole section from 3:09-4:17 is a bit limp. I think (and I think you think) that Big Vern got the orchestra to slow down a little more than necessary, because it doesn’t maintain the tension of what went before.

       
      “… I can’t imagine that was intentional. …”

      I can.

       
      “… Easy to correct, though. I increased the tempo of the last half with the first half through Audacity and now everything’s fine. That’s a great program ’cause you can change tempo without altering pitch. Anyway my mod Mars is now 7:11 minutes long. Now I don’t have to say “Hey, guys (and gals) wake up!” “

      Fabulous.

      It’s fun playing record producer.

      By the way, I use Audacity too.

       
      “I also felt that Neptune was a little too short and the ladies were just wee too “goosed” (if you will!) as you alluded to in your review. Soooo, the choir is about 14% less voluminous and the new tempo is 7:28. Bottom line, I’m now really pleased with the overall Handley Planets.”

      Excellent.

       
      “Just thought I’d share this with you.”

      I’m exceptionally glad you did.

       
      “Tad”

      Thanks, Tad!

      Like

  2. wonderboy September 20, 2016 / 5:12 pm

    for many a classic, but for me just a good performance and a average sound.

    Like

  3. William Baker July 4, 2017 / 12:41 pm

    This recording is available for $.99 US on Amazon with the Big English Box. Lots of other good stuff on there also. At that price the fact that it’s not as good overall as Dutoit or Ozawa becomes easier to accept.

    Like

    • Peter May 23, 2018 / 11:12 am

      Howdy, Thü

      It’s nice to meet a fellow Planets reviewer.

      Unfortunately, I can’t help with a high-resolution version of Handley’s account. The Handley Planets CD I have is the one with the white cover (“The Royal Philharmonic Collection”).

      By the way, I’ve found another Handley Planets CD to add to your reissues list. It’s available on eBay:

      https://www.ebay.com/itm/Gustav-Holst-Planets-The-Handley-Rpo-CD-2005/292519092154

      It has this cover:

      So there’s another to add to your Handley collection.

      Like

  4. Tad March 23, 2020 / 3:38 pm

    This recording IMHO should rate higher on your list… As a matter of fact this WHOLE selection of discs. by the Royal Philharmonic are well recorded and the performances are top notch. Vernon Handley’s is especially well done….The sound is ever so slightly recessed but overall enjoyable…

    Like

  5. Bob Wood December 23, 2020 / 11:45 pm

    In the early mastering of this recording, after the tympani thwacks at the start of Uranus you could hear birds twittering in the eaves – St Augustine, Kilburn I believe. This is one of my favourite Planets. Great site by the way ;o)

    Like

    • Peter December 24, 2020 / 8:08 am

      Howdy, Bob

      “In the early mastering of this recording, after the tympani thwacks at the start of Uranus you could hear birds twittering in the eaves – “

      Cute. Unfortunately, on my copy of the CD (this one) I couldn’t hear them (presumably, just after the 16-second mark), even when I turned up the volume to maximum. I’m afraid my tinnitus got in the way.

      “St Augustine, Kilburn I believe.”

      Yes indeed. The liner notes say:

      “Digitally recorded in October 1993 at St. Augustine’s Church, Kilburn, London.”

      “This is one of my favourite Planets.”

      Excellent. I’m glad you like it as much as you do. There’s a lot to like.

      “Great site by the way ;o)”

      Aw, shucks. Thanks, Bob.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Bob Wood December 24, 2020 / 11:38 pm

        I have two versions of Handley’s Planets – one the Tring/RPO (with the birds) and the other a Membran SACD (without the birds!). So at some point there was some editing done! I have to admit some bias towards Tod Handley since, when he was music director in Guildford, I sang in his choirs. It was him who turned me into a British music fan! If I had your application I’d do a similar site for Walton’s 1st Symphony; I must have over 20 recordings of this on LP, CD and download – not that I’m obsessed with this, or anything. LOL!

        Incidentally I posted Holst’s own 1926 recording on my “Classics and Vinyl” YouTube channel from an HMV Treasury LP. https://youtu.be/Ie14KxebHEE The comments to this video mentioned a number of other performances . . .

        Like

      • Peter December 25, 2020 / 9:02 am

        Over 20 recordings of Walton’s 1st? I haven’t even heard it yet! (Note to Self: Listen to Walton’s 1st symphony, Peter.)

        When I latch on to a piece of music I tend to go overboard and buy as many versions of that piece of music as I can find (and afford). I did it with the ballets of Tchaikovsky, the ballets of Stravinsky, and especially Carmina Burana.

        I don’t know why I do, but I do. So I understand your Walton 1 exuberance completely.

        I have a feeling that you and I are collectors.

        As for your YouTube post of the Holst 1926 Planets, it’s probably the best I’ve ever heard it. I’ve only ever heard the 1926 recording a few times, mainly because a) the sound quality is severely restricted, and b) I’m a monophobe.

        But your transfer is eminently listenable.

        Thanks, Bob.

        Like

  6. Bob Wood December 28, 2020 / 8:12 pm

    Yes, a bit of a collector! LOL! Walton’s 1st is a fascinating work – a Sibelian 1st movement, a Rite-of-Spring-esque 2nd movement, a self-proclaimed melancholic 3rd movement and a Pomp’n’Circumstance finale with a last post. (Well, your take might be different!). Andre Previn’s 1966 RCA is probably the best all-round performance, but with indifferent sound. The best modern performance (IMO) is Martyn Brabbins on Hyperion. I stuck a video on my channel recently of Bernard Haitink’s slightly wayward version on a really well recorded HMV LP. Wayward in the sense of some slow tempi. But it holds well together and is an interesting interpretation. https://youtu.be/euJtNlztOww

    BTW what’s your preferred version of Carmina Burana? I only have one – Andre Previn on HMV. I’ve resisted the temptation to get others since I like this one so much I don’t want to spoil it!

    Bob

    (BTW having to try out difference logins to WordPress – not my favourite site!)

    Like

    • Peter December 29, 2020 / 9:59 am

      Yowser, Bob

      Well, I got around to listening to Walton’s 1st symphony. I liked it, but didn’t love it. I might have to listen to it a few more times. The one I heard was Ashkenazy’s, so I’ll probably need to listen to a few different interpretations in case Ashkenazy’s was dodgy.

      Actually, I like what I’ve heard of Walton’s symphonies. (Bits here and there.) I think I’ll buy his symphony cycle some time and dive into it.

      “BTW what’s your preferred version of Carmina Burana?”

      I have a few:

      Muti (especially for Arleen Auger’s amazing singing)
      Chailly
      Blomstedt
      Runnicles

      Incidentally, I contributed to a Carmina Burana thread on the Talk Classical forum. I start gabbing on page 2:

      https://www.talkclassical.com/34520-carmina-burana-recording-recommendations-2.html

      Like

  7. Bob Wood December 29, 2020 / 8:51 pm

    Thanks, Peter, for your Carmina Burana suggestions – I need to check these out.

    As far as Walton 1 goes (and his cycle only has 2 symphonies – not a prolific composer our Willie!), I’ve just come across this video comparing a number of recordings. https://youtu.be/PizWjvoQPFA The guy totally rubbishes Haitink – I think a little unfairly – but agrees with me that the young Previn on RCA hits all the spots. One to avoid that he didn’t mention was Previn’s remake on Telarc – sumptuous sound but a performance really off the boil. His assertion that many orchestras are not really up to the demands of the piece is probably correct. I have an LP of the LSO from 1935 with Hamilton Harty conducting (the work’s first recording after its premiere) and how the orchestra hang on in is very impressive – they’re within a whisker of dissolving into a quivering wreck many times! It gives the piece a lot of nervous energy. Ha!

    Like

    • Peter December 30, 2020 / 8:57 am

      Walton only wrote two symphonies? Oops. I was thinking of Malcolm Arnold, who wrote nine symphonies.

      David Hurwitz, the guy in that video, is a musicologist/percussionist/smartarse who runs the ClassicsToday.com website. He’s incredibly knowledgeable – and entertainingly opinionated – on all sorts of classical music. I only recently discovered his YouTube channel a couple of weeks ago, and have been watching his videos almost non-stop since then. (He has a video on The Planets.)

      Thanks for letting me know about Hurwitz’s Walton video. I didn’t know he made it. I’ll be watching it very shortly.

      Tally ho!

      Like

Leave a comment